Which of the following methods to reduce cantilever moment is better in incremental launching, (i) temporary nose, (ii) mast or (iii) auxiliary piers?

Posted in Bridge Engineering | Email This Post Email This Post

The use of mast is an alternative to temporary nose. From practical point of view, the use of mast requires continual adjustment of forces in the guys when the superstructure is pushed forward. On the other hand, the implementation of temporary nose system does not require much attention during operation.

For large span lengths (>50m) it is advantageous to adopt auxiliary piers because this helps reduce the central prestress required. However, it may not be economical for auxiliary piers with height more than 40m.

This question is taken from book named – A Closer Look at Prevailing Civil Engineering Practice – What, Why and How by Vincent T. H. CHU.

More Entries :

Comments

Share Information

What is Civil Engineering

Journals Books And Softwares

Branches Of Civil Engineering

Civil Engineering Jobs

Knowledge Center

Civil Engineering Universities/Events

Gallery - Civil Engineering Pictures

Search


Author

Top Contributors

Yahoo Group - Civil Engineering Portal

Subscribe to EngineeringCivil.com


Powered by groups.yahoo.com

Recently Added

Civil Engineering Links

Spread the Word