Search

Visual Inspection of Concrete Structure

Posted in Concrete Engineering, Project Reports, Research Papers | Email This Post Email This Post |
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By
Kaushal Kishore
Materials Engineer, Roorkee

Visual inspection is one of the most versatile and powerful of the NDT methods, and it is typically one of the first steps in the evaluation of a concrete structure. Visual inspection can provide a wealth of information that may lead to positive identification of the cause of observed distress. However, its effectiveness depends on the knowledge and experience of the investigator. Broad knowledge in structural engineering, concrete materials, and construction methods is needed to extract the most information from visual inspection.

Before performing a detailed visual inspection, the investigator should develop and follow a definite plan to maximize the quality of the record data. Visual inspection has the obvious limitation that only visible surface can be inspected. Internal defects go unnoticed and no quantitative information is obtained about the properties of the concrete. For these reasons, a visual inspection is usually supplemented by one or more of the other NDT methods, such as by concrete test hammer, ultrasonic concrete tester and partial destructive testing by drilling cores and testing them for compressive strength.

Optical magnification allows a more detailed view of local areas of distress. Available instrument range from simple magnifying glasses to more expensive hand-held microscope. A very useful tool for crack inspection is a small hand-held magnifier with a built-in measuring scale on the lens closet to the surface being viewed. With such a crack comparator the width of surface opening cracks can be measured accurately. Identification of cracks in a concrete structure is given in table-1.

Table-1: Non-Structural cracks which can occur in concrete:

Type of Cracking

Common Location

Cause of Cracking

Remedy

Time of Appearance

Fig. No.

Plastic Settlement Top of columns, slabs Excess bleeding Reduce bleeding 10 min to 3 h a
Plastic shrinkage RCC slabs Rapid early drying Prevent evaporation just after casting 30 min to 6 h b
Early thermal contraction Thick walls and slabs Rapid cooling Reduce heat and insulate 1 day to 2 or 3 weeks
Long term drying shrinkage thin wall and slabs Inefficient joints Reduce water content, Improve curing Several weeks or month C/1, C/2
Crazing Slabs Rick mixes over travelling, poor curing Improve curing and finishing 1 to 7 day
Corrosion of reinforcement Column and beams Inadequate cover, poor quality concrete Eliminate the listed cause more than 2 years d
Alkali aggregate reaction Deep location Reactive aggregate and high alkali cement Eliminate the listed cause More than 5 years e
Sulphate Attack Members expose to sulphate attach Soluble sulphates as SO3 in soil and ground water Ref. table 4 IS: 456-2000 f

TESTING CONCRETE BY TAPPING METHOD
As part of visual inspection the strength of concrete may be roughly obtained by tapping method. However, this may not be treated as substitute of cube testing. Tapping an object with a hammer is one of the oldest form of non-destructive testing based on stress-wave propagation. The method is subjective, as it depends on the experience of the operator, sounding is a useful method for detecting near-surface delimitations.

Advertisements

In the tapping method the strength of concrete may be determine either from its hardness when scratched with a metal “pencil” or a chisel, or from the character of the sound when struck with a hammer, or from the character of the mark left after a hammer blow.

The tapping method is not very exact but it is simple and can be easily applied for an approximate determination of the strength of concrete. On the concrete to be tested a smooth surface about 100×100 mm is chosen and cleaned with a wire brush. Then a hammer 300-400 gms in mass is struck against the concrete from elbow height directly or through a metal worker’s chisel placed at right angles to the tested surface. The size of the mark left by the hammer or the chisel and the sound of the hammer stroke are indicative of the strength of concrete. Ten blows of average force are made at different points on the specimen. Results, exceeding low, are disregarded. Approximate values of the strength of concrete obtained from these tests are given in table.2.

The tapping method is used for an approximate determination of strength of concrete, because the force of the blow and the accompanying sound vary greatly depending on subjective factors.

Table-2. Strength of concrete by tapping method:

Strength of concrete (N/mm2)

Test Results

Blow of hammer (0.4 kg) upon concrete surface Blow of hammer (0.4kg) upon chisel placed at right angles to concrete surface Scratching by chisel
Blow 6.0 Sound-toneless deep dent with crumbling edges Chisel is easily driven into concrete Concrete cuts easily and crumbles
6-10 Sound-slightly toneless. Dent has smooth edges, concrete crumbles Chisel can be driven into concrete deeper than 5 mm Visible scratches 1-1.5 mm deep
10-20 Sound-clear whitish mark remains Thin scales split off round the mark Visible scratches no deeper than 1 mm
Over 20 Sound-ringing metallic mark-visible Mark is not very deep Barely visible scratches

VISUAL INSPECTION OF FIRE DAMAGE CONCRETE
Visual observation of spalling and colour change aided by surface tapping is the principle method of assessment of fire damage. Conclusive results may be obtained by hammer test, ultrasonic pulse velocity measurement, drilling of cores and testing them for compressive strength. Finally, if required by load testing of structure. For detail investigation testing of steel and chemical analysis of concrete samples may be carried out.

Table- 3: Visual observation of fire-damaged concrete structure

Changes in fire-damaged concrete:
<3000C Boundary cracking alone
250-3000C Aggregate colour changes to pink to red
3000C Paste develops a brown or pinkish colour
300-5000C Serious cracking in paste
400-4500C Portlandite converts to lime
5000C Change to anisotropic paste
500-6000C Paste changes from red or purple to grey
5730C Quartz gives a rapid expansion resulting from a phase change from alpha to beta quartz
600-7500C Limestone particles become chalky white
9000C Carbonates start to shrink
950-10000C Paste changes from grey to buff
Change in aggregate
250-3000C Aggregate colour changes to pink to red
5730C Quartz gives a rapid expansion resulting from a phase change from alpha to beta quartz
600-7500C Limestone particles become chalky white
9000C Carbonates start to shrink
Changes in the paste
3000C Paste develops a brown or pinkish colour
400-4500C Portlandite converts to lime
500-6000C Paste changes from red or purple to grey
950-10000C Paste changes from grey to buff

CONCLUSIONS:
1. Visual inspection is a very powerful NDT method. Its efficiency, however, is to a large extent governed by the experience and knowledge of the investigator. A broad knowledge of structural behaviour, materials, and construction methods is desirable. Visual inspection is typically one aspect of the total evaluation plan, which will often be supplemented by a series of other NDT methods or invasive procedures.
2. Visual features may be related to workmanship, structure serviceability and material deterioration, and it is particularly important that the engineer be able to differentiate between the various types of cracking which may be encountered.
3. Visual inspection will also provide the basis of judgment relating to access and safety requirements. There are already frightening examples where public safety has been put at risk due to lack of simple regular visual inspection.

Advertisements

REFERENCES:
1. IS: 456:2000, Plain and reinforced concrete- Code of practice (Fourth Revision) BIS, New Delhi.
2. Assessment and Repair of Fire-damaged Concrete Structure, Tech. Report. 33. Concrete Society, London, 1990
3. Non-Structural cracks in concrete, Technical Report No. 22 3rd Edn, Concrete Society, London, 1992.
4. Smith, J.R. Assessment of Concrete Building, Concrete International, 13, No. 12, Dec, 1991, pp. 48-49.
5. Pallock, D.J. Kay, E.A. and Fookes, P.G. Crack Mapping for Investigation of Middle East Concrete. Concrete, 15, No. 5, May, 1981, pp. 12-18.

plastic settlement and shrinkage
restrained drying shrinkage
suphate attack

We at engineeringcivil.com are thankful to Sir Kaushal Kishore for submitting his research paper on “Visual Inspection of Concrete Structure” to us. This will be of great help to all civil engineers.

More Entries :
Comments
  • Jaiprakash Patel May 2, 2012 at 3:49 am

    Please arrange me the quality control procedure/plan for bridge Pedestal (Grade of Concrete M40)

  • Post a comment